If you are interested in one particular clinical area you can sign up for RSS feed direct from the clinical area you are interested in. Take a look at this video to see how it works
Filed under: Uncategorized
February 5, 2009 • 12:34 am 0
If you are interested in one particular clinical area you can sign up for RSS feed direct from the clinical area you are interested in. Take a look at this video to see how it works
Filed under: Uncategorized
August 26, 2010 • 6:36 pm 0
Stina Lilje, kan Friberg, Anders Wykman, Eva Skillgate
Objectives: Traditionally, orthopedic outpatient waiting lists are
long, and many referrals are for conditions that do not respond to
interventions available at an orthopedic outpatient department.
The overall objective of this trial was to investigate whether it is
possible to reduce orthopedic waiting lists through integrative
medicine. Specific aims were to compare the effects of naprapathic
manual therapy to conventional orthopedic care for outpatients
with nonurgent musculoskeletal disorders unlikely to benefit from
surgery regarding pain, physical function, and perceived recovery.
Methods: Seventy-eight patients referred to an orthopedic outpatient
department in Sweden were included in this pragmatic
randomized controlled trial. The 2 interventions compared were
naprapathic manual therapy (index group) and conventional
orthopedic care (control group). Pain, physical function, and
perceived recovery were measured by questionnaires at baseline
and after 12, 24, and 52 weeks. The number of patients being
discharged from the waiting lists and the level of agreement
concerning management decisions between the naprapath and the
orthopedists were also estimated.
Results: After 52 weeks, statistically significant differences between
the groups were found regarding impairment in pain, increased
physical function, and regarding perceived recovery, favoring the
index group. Sixty-two percent of the patients in the index group
agreed to be discharged from the waiting list. The level of agreement
concerning the management decisions was 80%.
Discussion: The trial suggests that naprapathic manual therapy may
be an alternative to consider for orthopedic outpatients with
disorders unlikely to benefit from surgery.
Clinical Journal of Pain 2010;26:602–610 - abstract
Full text available in
through MTABC member only website (link) under the research tab and then library.
A naprapathic treatment consisted of:
massage, treatment of myofascial trigger points (through
pressure), therapeutic stretching, manipulation/mobilization
of the spine or other joints, and—if required—electrotherapy
(transcutaneous neuromuscular stimulation or
therapeutic ultrasonic waves), combined with home exercises.
Licensed naprapaths normally work with their own
clinic responsibility. Consequently, diagnostic and management
decisions as well as treatments were performed only
by the naprapath, without any second opinion from an
orthopedist.
Filed under: Conservative therapies, Exercise therapy, Manual therapy, orthopedics, Trigger points
November 26, 2009 • 7:45 pm 1
The relationship between muscle trigger points (TrPs) and joint hypomobility is frequently recognized by clinicians. Among different manual therapies aimed at inactivating muscle TrPs, ischemic compression and spinal manipulation have shown moderately strong evidence for immediate pain relief. Reduction of joint mobility appears related to local muscles innervated from the segment, which suggests that muscle and joint impairments may be indivisible and related disorders in pain patients. Two clinical studies have investigated the relationship between the presence of muscle TrPs and joint hypomobility in patients with neck pain. Both studies reported that all patients exhibited segmental hypomobility at C3-C4 zygapophyseal joint and TrPs in the upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, or levator scapulae muscles. There are several theories that have discussed the relationship between TrP and joint hypomobility. First, increased tension of the taut muscular bands associated with a TrP and facilitation of motor activity can maintain displacement stress on the joint. Alternatively, it may be that the abnormal sensory input from the joint hypomobility may reflexively activate TrPs. It is also conceivable that TrPs provide a nociceptive barrage to the dorsal horn neurons and facilitate joint hypomobility. There is scientific evidence showing change in muscle sensitivity in muscle TrP after spinal manipulation, which suggests that clinicians should include treatment of joint hypomobility in the management of TrPs. Nevertheless, the order in which these muscle and joint impairments should be treated is not known and requires further investigation.
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2009; 17(2): 74-7 (46 ref) – abstract
MTABC members – permalink (sign in to EBSCO for access)
Filed under: Conservative therapies, Topic review, Trigger points , Joints -- Physiopathology, Manual therapy, Muscles -- Physiopathology, Neck Pain -- Therapy, Trigger Point
October 1, 2009 • 7:19 pm 0
Cleland JA, Abbott JH, Kidd MO, Stockwell S, Cheney S, Gerrard DF, Flynn TW.
To compare the effectiveness of 2 different conservative management approaches in the treatment of plantar heel pain.
There is insufficient evidence to establish the optimal physical therapy management strategies for patients with heel pain, and little evidence of long-term effects.
Patients with a primary report of plantar heel pain underwent a standard evaluation and completed a number of patient self-report questionnaires, including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Patients were randomly assigned to be treated with either an electrophysical agents and exercise (EPAX) or a manual physical therapy and exercise (MTEX) approach. Outcomes of interest were captured at baseline and at 4-week and 6-month follow-ups. The primary aim (effects of treatment on pain and disability) was examined with a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA). The hypothesis of interest was the 2-way interaction (group by time).
Sixty subjects (mean [SD] age, 48.4 [8.7] years) satisfied the eligibility criteria, agreed to participate, and were randomized into the EPAX (n = 30) or MTEX group (n = 30). The overall group-by-time interaction for the ANOVA was statistically significant for the LEFS (P = .002), FAAM (P = .005), and pain (P = .043). Between-group differences favored the MTEX group at both 4-week (difference in LEFS, 13.5; 95% CI: 6.3, 20.8) and 6-month (9.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 18.6) follow-ups.
The results of this study provide evidence that MTEX is a superior management approach over an EPAX approach in the management of individuals with plantar heel pain at both the short- and long-term follow-ups. Future studies should examine the contribution of the different components of the exercise and manual physical therapy programs.
Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 Aug;39(8):573-85. – abstract
Power point presentation of the main outcome charts- here
Filed under: Exercise therapy, Foot and ankle, Manual therapy , iontophoresis, manipulation, mobilization, plantar fasciitis, plantar fasciosis
September 17, 2009 • 4:50 am 0
Filed under: Assessment, Hip, Physical examination, Topic review , Ilium, Leg length inequality, Mechanical, Posture, Sacroiliac joint, Torsion
September 4, 2009 • 6:15 pm 0
Hughes PC, Taylor NF, Green RA
Question: Do clinical tests accurately diagnose rotator cuff pathology?
Design: A systematic review of investigations into the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology.
Participants: People with shoulder pain who underwent clinical testing in order to diagnose rotator cuff pathology.
Outcome measures: The diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests was determined using likelihood ratios.
Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The 13 studies evaluated 14 clinical tests in 89 separate evaluations of diagnostic accuracy. Only one evaluation, palpation for supraspinatus ruptures, resulted in significant positive and negative likelihood ratios. Eight of the 89 evaluations resulted in either significant positive or negative likelihood ratios. However, none of these eight positive or negative likelihood ratios were found in other studies. Of the 89 evaluations of clinical tests 71 (80%) did not result in either significant positive or negative likelihood ratio evaluations across different studies.
Conclusion: Overall, most tests for rotator cuff pathology were inaccurate and cannot be recommended for clinical use. At best, suspicion of a rotator cuff tear may be heightened by a positive palpation, combined Hawkins/painful arc/infraspinatus test, Napoleon test, lift-off test, belly-press test, or drop-arm test, and it may be reduced by a negative palpation, empty can test or Hawkins-Kennedy test.
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 54: 159–170 – full text
“The poor accuracy of clinical tests for rotator cuff pathology could be related to a lack of anatomical validity of the tests or it may be that the close relationships of structures in the shoulder may make it difficult to identify specific pathologies with clinical tests.”
Filed under: Assessment, Physical examination, Shoulder , differential, Review, Rotator cuff; Diagnosis
July 3, 2009 • 11:51 pm 0
DM Walton, J Pretty, JC MacDermid, RW Teasell
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) is the most common reported injury following motor vehicle accident. Evidence for prognosis and intervention are difficult to interpret due to differences in inception times, outcomes used, and sample heterogeneity. METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted to identify published studies of prognosis following whiplash. Rigorous inclusion criteria were applied to allow for meaningful results to be drawn. Data were extracted, transformed where necessary, and pooled to allow estimation of the odds ratio for any factor with at least 3 data points in the literature.
RESULTS: From 11 cohorts (n = 3193), 25 factors were identified with at least 3 data points in the existing literature. Of these, 9 were found to be significant predictors based on the odds ratio and confidence limits: no postsecondary education, female gender, history of previous neck pain,baseline neck pain intensity greater than 55/100, presence of neck pain at baseline, presence of headache at baseline, catastrophizing, WAD grade 2 or 3, and no seat belt in use at time of collision. Neck pain intensity, WAD grade, headache, and no postsecondary education were robust to publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a rigorous process for the identification and extraction of data from a homogenous subset of the prognostic WAD literature, we were able to identify several factors for which information is easy to collect clinically and could provide clinicians with a good sense of prognosis following whiplash injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 1a.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(5):334-350, Epub 18 July 2008. View Full Article
doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2765
Filed under: Cervical, Prognosis, Whiplash Injuries , Cervical spine, neck, Prognosis, WAD
July 3, 2009 • 6:47 pm 0
JC MacDermid, DM Walton, S Avery, A Blanchard, E Etruw, C McAlpine, CH Goldsmith
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of clinical measurement. OBJECTIVE: To find and synthesize evidence on the psychometric properties and usefulness of the neck disability index (NDI). BACKGROUND: The NDI is the most commonly used outcome measure for neck pain, and a synthesis of knowledge should provide a deeper understanding of its use and limitations. METHODS AND MEASURES: Using a standard search strategy (1966 to September 2008) and 4 databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and PsychInfo), a structured search was conducted and supplemented by web and hand searching. In total, 37 published primary studies, 3 reviews, and 1 in-press paper were analyzed. Pairs of raters conducted data extraction and critical appraisal using structured tools. Ranking of quality and descriptive synthesis were performed.
RESULTS: Horizon estimation suggested the potential for 1 missed paper. The agreement between raters on quality assessments was high(kappa = 0.82). Half of the studies reached a quality level greater than 70%. Failures to report clear psychometric objectives/hypotheses or to rationalize the sample size were the most common design flaws. Studies often focused on less clinically applicable properties, like construct validity or group reliability, than transferable data, like known group differences or absolute reliability (standard error of measurement [SEM] or minimum detectable change [MDC]). Most studies suggest that the NDI has acceptable reliability, although intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) range from 0.50 to 0.98. Longer test intervals and the definition of stable can influence reliability estimates. A number of high-quality published (Korean, Dutch, Spanish, French, Brazilian Portuguese) and commercially supported translations are available. The NDI is considered a 1-dimensional measure that can be interpreted as an interval scale. Some studies question these assumptions. The MDC is around 5/50 for uncomplicated neck pain and up to 10/50 for cervical radiculopathy. The reported clinically important difference (CID) is inconsistent across different studies ranging from 5/50 to 19/50. The NDI is strongly correlated (>0.70) to a number of similar indices and moderately related to both physical and mental aspects of general health.
CONCLUSION: The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain. More studies of CID in different clinical populations and the relationship to subjective/work/function categories are required.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(5):400-417.- full text PDF
doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2930
Filed under: Cervical, Outcome measure , Cervical spine, Outcome measure, reliability
June 11, 2009 • 10:22 pm 0
Calvert, Chambers, Regan et al
The diagnosis of a superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesion through physical examination has been widely reported in the literature. Most of these studies report high sensitivities and specificities, and claim to be accurate, valid, and reliable. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate these studies to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support the use of the SLAP physical examination tests as valid and reliable diagnostic test procedures.
Strict epidemiologic methodology was used to obtain and collate all relevant articles. Sackett’s guidelines were applied to all articles. Confidence intervals and likelihood ratios were determined.
Fifteen of 29 relevant studies met the criteria for inclusion. Only one article met all of Sackett’s critical appraisal criteria. Confidence intervals for both the positive and negative likelihood ratios contained the value 1.
The current literature being used as a resource for teaching in medical schools and continuing education lacks the validity necessary to be useful. There are no good physical examination tests that exist for effectively diagnosing a SLAP lesion.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volume 62, Issue 5, May 2009, Pages 558-563 – abstract
Filed under: Physical examination, Shoulder, Topic review , Diagnostic accuracy, Physical examination, Sensitivity, Shoulder, Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesion, Systematic review